| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Runner's Web Blog - A Random Commentary | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bookmark the Runner's Web Email the Runner's Web Post Your Comments | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
August 6, 2008
CBC News Item: Halifax is getting a new $40.5-million sports centre, including an indoor track and two swimming pools. Ottawa remains the only city of any size in the country to NOT have a public indoor track. But then we have 7,846 ice surfaces so eight-year-olds can play 145 games per year. And that, in Canada, seesm to be the priority! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
We have been remiss in not posting to the blog. It's not that there is nothing to rant about - there is TOO MUCH to rant about.
Anyway, today's item is not a rant but a few raves! Listen to the debut of "The Running Show" on Team 1200 (Team1200.com) at Noon this Saturday, February 9th. Subscribe to the new Canadian Running Magazine at www.runningmagazine.ca. Also subscribe to another new running magazine, iRun at: IRunNation.com. IRun debuts at the end of April. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 25, 2007
Financial Help for Sensplex and Ray Friel Centre Daniel Proussalidis with Dan Pihlainen - CFRA
Ottawa City Hall is throwing a life-line to two private-public partnerships in the capital facing financial difficulties. Councillors emerged from a closed door meeting Wednesday afternoon agreeing to shore up the struggling Bell Sensplex. That aid plan is worth about $1.4 million over three years. CFRA News has also learned that the City of Ottawa is moving to take over the Ray Friel Centre in the east end. Its operating company says the centre faces a shortfall of a million dollars a year. Comment: It seems that there is a bottomless pit of money at City Hall for hockey but not one red cent for an indoor track. Go Deviles, go! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 10, 2007
An article in the April 1st Sunday Citizen stated - "It's only a slight exaggeration to say that the Running Room made Ottawa a 'running town'." The article refers to 1999 as the start of this process.
I disagree. Let's look at some of the high points of running in Ottawa between 1975 and 1984: * 1975: The National Capital Marathon was founded. It was Canada's largest marathon and Ottawa's only annual running event of any distance. The race was the first marathon to use online computers to process results. The marathon became known as the "runner's race."
* 1976: The NCM hosted the marathon Olympic trials. It would do so again in 1984 and in between these dates it was the site of two Commonwealth Games Trials.
1978: Canadian's Brian Maxwell (founder of Power Bar) and Paul Bannon put on a fierce race, battling the length of the canal and culminating in a sprint finish which saw Maxwell prevail by 0.2 seconds which at the time was the closest marathon finish on record. 1981: The NCM demonstrated that it was a leader in terms of quality performances as 630 runners broke three hours. (In 2006, only 109 did so.) A women from New York City (and a member of the New York Road Runner's Club) was in town on race day in 1981 and decided to enter and run the first 20 miles of race dropping out at the Chateau Laurier where she was staying. Afterwards she said "What a fast field! In New York I'm middle of the pack; here I was last before the race left the Carleton campus."
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 1, 2007
By Dave Stewart I did some comparisons between the 1981 National Capital Marathon results and those from the 2006 ING Ottawa Marathon. 25 years apart, the number of marathon runners each year was similar, although in 1981 the marathon was the only game in town. It was "go long, or stay home". Today, overall participation on the race weekend is way up because the philosophy is different; participating and completing the events are more important to most than racing and competing. In 1981, more runners were under 3 hours (630 - 18%) than over 4 hours (512 -14%). In 2006, 64% of the runners were slower than 4 hours; while less than 4% broke 3 hours (and many of those were invited "elite" athletes). There may be many more people running today than back in the early 80's, but the competitive Baby Boomers from the era of Frank Shorter and Bill Rodgers have been replaced by the Running Roomers! Some notable performances from 1981: Mike Dyon (winner in 2:16.07; in 2000, Mike ran 2:37.25), Ken Parker - 2:42.57(PB), Helen Cooper 2:49.59, (Coach) Ray Elrick 3:00.00 (631st!), Larry MCCloskey 3:15.50 (1984 - 2:24.28!)
Note: John and Howie (and Bill Williams) have run every Ottawa Marathon since 1975! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
October 26, 2006:
Letters To The Editor, Ottawa Citizen Promises, promises Mayor Bob Chiarelli announced plans to construct 100 new soccer fields. Soccer players should hope that there is more substance to this promise than there was to the one regarding an indoor track two elections ago. Ottawa remains the only Canadian city to not have at least one public indoor running track. Ken Parker, Ottawa | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 27, 2006:
Athletics Canada reverses position, will send a "self-funded" team September 26th 2006 - After further consideration Chief High Performance Officer, Martin Goulet, announced today that Athletics Canada will participate to the 2007 IAAF World Cross Country Championships in Mombasa, Kenya. The decision was re-visited, taking into account a number of factors, including the upcoming appointment of the Cross-Country Running Coordinator. With the input and direction of the new Coordinator, Athletics Canada will conduct a thorough analysis of the discipline and how it fits into the overall sustainable International Podium Bound success plan. Athletes interested in competing in Mombassa should be aware of the following facts:
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 24, 2006:
Canada will not send a team to the 2006 World Cross Country Running Championships Apparently the Francophonie Games are more important for our athletes than the World XC Meet. Only in Canada. Pity, eh? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 17, 2006:
City extends tax break for Scotiabank Place Well once again, the City of Ottawa, whose line is that that's can't afford to provide so many core services to the taxpayers of the city, have given billionaire Euegene Melnyk a continued tax break on the Senator's playpen in Ottawa's west end. I did not notice if our esteemed councillors were wearing their Senator sweaters when they voted to continue this subsidy. It is one thing for Melnyk to maintain a residence in the Barbados to avoid paying Canadian taxes but surely he should pay the going rate for his operations in Canada. With the subsidy given to the Senators since 1999 the City could have built many much needed recreational facilites or for that matter a whole bunch of bridges over the Canal to facilitate drinking on Elgin Street. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
August 17, 2006:
Mr. Ken Parker
Dear Mr. Parker: Thank you for your electronic mail of June 19, 2006, requesting clarification of the Government of Canada’s role with respect to funding for the Francophonie Games. In the context of the Francophonie Games as a multi-sport international event, Canada, Canada-Quebec and Canada-New Brunswick are considered three separate participating states, each requesting funding independently from their state representative (Canada, Quebec and New Brunswick respectively) to offset participation costs. Funding for the Canadian team for the Francophonie Games is provided by three sources within the federal government, namely the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, the International Francophonie directorate of the Department of Canadian Heritage, and Sport Canada. The funding from Sport Canada for the 2005 Francophonie Games was specifically for the training camps, travel and vaccinations of athletes. Athletics Canada is correct in its statement that funding for the Francophonie Games is not part of its annual funding contribution through the Sport Support Program, the mechanism through which it receives the bulk of its funding. However, through the Hosting and Major Games Branch of Sport Canada, the organization did receive funding for a training camp, travel and vaccinations, which was directly linked to the Games. In addition, I understand that Athletics Canada received further support from the International Francophonie directorate of the Department of Canadian Heritage for participation in the Francophonie Games. It should be noted that Sport Canada officials have contacted Athletics Canada officials directly to discuss this matter further and to explain the particular mechanisms of funding for the Francophonie Games. I trust that this information provides the clarification that you seek. Please accept my best wishes. Yours sincerely, Michael Chong | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
August 4, 2006:
Five Lions competitors leave next week for the world junior championships in Beijing, each one of them having paid $3,000 to get the experience - Ottawa Sun, August 3, 2006
For years now, the majority of our team at the world cross country running championships have paid their own way. Rather than correcting this injustice, the government is extending it to the world junior championships. Perhaps our MPs should pay their own expenses when they travel to represent the country. On the other hand, our government fully funds the Francophonie Games -- a minor league event that is more about politics than sport -- and associated training camps. I have written several letters to our new sports minister and after repeated follow-ups and many months I finally received a response which indicates that he -- like the Liberal sport ministers before him -- really does not understand the problem. All levels of government have been guilty of not supporting our athletes. When mercenary sport whines and asks for grants or tax subsidies, governments fall all over themselves to accommodate sports businesses and multimillionaire athletes. Yet we have junior athletes paying $3,000 to represent Canada. Only in Canada, eh? Pity. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
July 6, 2006:
If you build it, they won't come
Comment: Another example which proves that we pay far too many taxes. All levels of government, who cannot fix potholes on the roads, provide decent health care, properly fund our military, have no difficulty giving our money to multi-millionaires to build spectator-domes. In the meantime, athletes representing Canada at world championships pay their own way. Only in Canada, eh? Pity. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 25, 2006:
RunnersWeb5K.com Race for Women
Based on the feedback we have received on the race it seems clear that:
The only downside to the race was that Emilie Mondor, one of only two Canadian women to have broken 15 minutes for 5K, was not able to race due an injury suffered in training last week. Emilie was upset with not being able to race and has assured me that, health permitting, she will run next year. It was a good day for Canadian women's running. Thanks to the Somersault Events team for managing the event. And most importantly, thanks to the women runners who came out and put on such a good show. Come back next year and bring a friend. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 19, 2006:
Canadian Athletes Pay To Represent Their Country On February 15, 2006 I posted the following comments on my Blog and emailed the Minister of Sport's office asking for a justification for funding a third-world event while asking our athletes to pay their own expenses to represent Canada at the World Cross Country Running Championships.
Dear Mr. Parker: Thank you for your electronic mail regarding federal government funding for the participation of Canadian athletes in the IAAF World Cross Country Championships held in Fukuoka, Japan. Please excuse the delay of my reply. I appreciate your advising me of your views on this matter and have carefully noted your comments. Although the Government of Canada is the largest investor in the Canadian sport system, it should be recognized that our sport system is based on partnerships and the contributions of various partners, including sport organizations, various levels of government, the private sector, communities, volunteers and Canadian citizens. The Department of Canadian Heritage, through Sport Canada, is committed to contributing its share to help support sport in Canada. Accordingly, Sport Canada provides funding to eligible national sport organizations (NSOs), such as Athletics Canada, that assist Canadian high-performance able-bodied and disabled athletes who compete at the national and international levels. Assistance is provided to organizations that meet the eligibility requirements of the Sport Funding and Accountability Framework (SFAF) to fund programs for national teams, coaching development, national championships and various other nationally based initiatives. The SFAF is a tool that helps Sport Canada determine the areas and levels at which NSOs, such as Athletics Canada, are eligible for federal support. In fiscal year 2005-2006, Athletics Canada received $2,498,376 through the Sport Canada Sport Support Program for its excellence and core funding programs for able-bodied athletes. This federal funding was allocated for specific projects proposed by Athletics Canada. Although federally funded NSOs are accountable to the federal government under the SFAF, Sport Canada does not have any jurisdiction over, nor the ability to intervene in, the internal rules, regulations or policies established by NSOs, including decisions pertaining to funding allocations. Sport Canada funding recipients, such as Athletics Canada, submit funding applications for their various projects to Sport Canada for consideration. After the applications have been thoroughly assessed by Sport Canada, projects and funding allocations are approved. The overall Sport Canada contribution to Athletics Canada covers a variety of projects, such as coaching development, national championships and national team programs that include events such as the World Cross Country Championships and the Francophonie Games. However, it should be noted that NSOs, such as Athletics Canada, are solely responsible for deciding how to allocate the funds provided to them by the public and private sectors. The decision to support a certain project is based on an NSO’s strategic direction related to both sport excellence and development. Ultimately, Athletics Canada is responsible for determining the allocation of funding to its athletes for their participation in various events, including the World Cross Country Championships and the Francophonie Games. "The Francophonie Games are funded directly by the Govt of Canada, Major Games and Hosting department of Sport Canada, Patrimoine Canada/Canadian Heritage and is not part of the Athletics Canada funding contribution." - Athletics Canada.
In the context of the Francophonie Games as an international multi-sport event, Canada, Canada-Quebec and Canada-New Brunswick are considered three separate participating states. Accordingly, each requests funding independently from their state representative (Canada, Quebec and New Brunswick respectively) to offset participation costs. It should be noted that federal government funding for the participation of Team Canada in the Francophonie Games is provided by three sources: the Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade, the Department of Canadian Heritage and Sport Canada. I understand that the funding provided by Sport Canada for the 2005 Francophonie Games was specifically allocated for athletes’ training camps, travel and vaccinations. I trust that this information is useful. Please accept my best wishes. Yours sincerely, Michael Chong Comments:
1. The response must have been written by someone who was paid by the word.
2. Despite the money laundering rationale the money all comes from one source - the Canadian taxpayer.
3. I am not aware of any other association that is funded 100% by our tax dollars
4. It appears that the Conservative government, like the Liberals before them, funds politics over sports.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 5, 2006:
Ottawa Race Weekend
The challenge for Ottawa Race Weekend will be how to handle the increased number of runners who will want to experience first hand what they saw on the CBC. Kudos to the race committee for organizing this event, the CBC for showing it across the country and title sponsor ING for making it all possible. Regarding the issue of 14 runners inadvertently shortcutting the course, if this results in straightening out the course, it will be an improvement. With the multiple parkways we have in Ottawa, a much straighter (and faster) route is possible. Any votes for returning to the original NCM course which was good enough to host two Olympic and Commonwealth Games trials and which allowed a women's course record which lasted 22 years and which was set without the use of male pacers? | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 4, 2006:
Pay to Run for Canada
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
June 3, 2006:
Ontario Amateur Athletes Recognized for Dedication and Commitment
This is a good starting point for improving the level of provincial support for our amateur athletes.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 26, 2006:
Let's Get A Move On
Surprise, surprise?
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
May 17, 2006:
Marathons
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 30, 2006:
Male pacers in women's races
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 22, 2006:
Scotiabank Place tax plan 'ridiculous
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 9, 2006:
Boston Marathon on TV - Not in Canada
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 3, 2006:
World Cross Country Championships
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
April 1, 2006:
Changes to Triathlon and Duathlon
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 17, 2006:
RunnersWeb5K.com Race for Women
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 16, 2006:
Pay to Run for Canada
On April 1-2, the IAAF World Cross Country Championships will be held in Fukuoka, Japan.
I'll post the response when (and if) I get it. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
March 8, 2006:
Sticking it to taxpayers
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 15, 2006:
Canadian Athletes Pay To Represent Their Country The IAAF World Cross Country Championships will be held in Fukuoka, Japan on April 1-2, 2006. As has become the norm, the majority of Canadian Athletes competing in this event will pay their own expenses. Both junior teams and the long course men's and women's teams will be "self-funded". Can someone explain how Canada could afford to send not one, not two but THREE teams to the Francophonie Games (a third-rate competition) in Niger last November - and throw in a fully-funded one week training camp - but cannot afford to fully fund our cross-country teams. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
February 4, 2006:
COC lacks Olympic spirit Battle over trademark with See You In ... fund seems petty MIKE ULMER -- Toronto Sun, February 1, 2006 Jane Roos, who founded the See You In ... fund, is challenging the Canadian Olympic Committee for taking the name of her amateur athlete charity. The fund has been renamed CAN Fund in the meantime. (Toronto Sun/Michael Peake) It took some doing, but the Canadian Olympic Committee has managed to make it harder for Canadian athletes to win medals. Harder because what was The See You In ... fund has had to divert $60,000 from athletes and readjust its focus in the wake of an imponderable decision by the COC. You remember the See You In ... fund. See You In Athens. See You In Turin. The fund is nine years old. It was envisioned by a Toronto woman, Jane Roos, with the sole purpose of garnering much needed money for Canadian athletes and it has worked splendidly. So far, the fund has redistributed about $3 million in private and corporate donations. Prominent Olympians such as hockey player Danielle Goyette and kayaker Adam van Koeverden have credited the fund for setting the table for gold medals. From a beginning where Roos and others canvassed for loonies and toonies with tin cans, the fund has grown to provide more than 500 athletes with athletic equipment, therapy and even food. Yesterday, Roos was overseeing a news conference to announce the fund was in a legal battle with, believe it or not, the COC because the Olympic organization had moved to absorb its trademark. As well, the See You In ... name and logo was changed to CAN Fund or Canadian Athletes Now. "When we got back from Athens we found out that they (the COC) had adopted our trademarks," Roos said. For the record, the COC has no quarrel with the fact that it adopted the trademarks. The move was entirely justified, said David Bedford, the COC's executive director of revenue generating, brand management and communications. The trademark issue, he said, was triggered by the use of the name of an Olympic city in the name of the fund. That, in the COC's view, linked it with the Olympic movement. "Our goal wasn't to impede their work, it was to protect against an Olympic association," Bedford said. "We are very supportive of what has been done. What we were doing was protecting the rights of companies who have invested in an Olympic association." The exclusivity of that kind of an association is the basis for its value. From the suits point of view, the See You In ... fund could be lumped in with the guy selling unauthorized knock-off souvenirs or maybe pirating a telecast. Never mind the countless hours volunteers put in to find money for athletes. Business was business. On the one hand, nothing really has changed. "We are the same organization, with the same goals," Roos said. Athletes who have done the paperwork for funding need not re-apply. The rebranding of the fund has been done pro bono by the firms of K. Inc. Marketing Management, Shikatani Lacroix and Hotspex. "I hope the athletes know we're not going away and we will persevere," Roos said. " I hope Canadians get behind us more than ever and give us the funding to help our athletes who are training for Beijing." She has gone to court to win her trademarks back. Under Canadian law, the COC can absorb the brand, post its action and await a challenge. Roos has spent $60,000 to fight a case that won't be heard until 2007. "I don't want them to have our brand and the goodwill we've created with our brand," she said. "We still have a legal brand, and I think we have a strong case." Sometimes, your reward for helping is a kick in the teeth. The fault here, is with the COC. Their expropriation of the trademark was punitive and petty. Imagine, co-opting a charity that put money in the hands of athletes to protect the interests of its richest corporate patrons. The COC and what is now CAN Fund are in the same business: Helping athletes. It's time the COC remembered that.
Comment:
I have been a supporter of Jane Roos and her fund for years and my former company sponsored an Olympic triathlete for seven years. If the COC did its job there would be no need for Jane's fund. The fact is 70% of our athletes live below the poverty line. Three-quarters of our cross country running team pays their own expenses every year to go to the world championships to represent Canada. The See You In Fund supported 244 out of 266 Canadian athletes in Athens including 11 of our 12 medallists. The COC seems to be more about building a bureaucracy than helping our athletes. Any organization that has an employee with a title like "executive director of revenue generating, brand management and communications" is too much into itself. The country needs more people like Jane. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 20, 2006:
Canadian Olympic Committe Mail Appeal for Funds I received a mail appeal for a donation to the Canadian Olympic Committee (COC) stating that "Your support is needed to help send Canada's team of medal hopefuls to Turin, Italy for the 2006 Olympic Winter Games...". I called the COC twice this week and left messages as I wanted to ask them what percentage of donations actually goes to the athletes. I have not received a response. With three-quarters of our Olympic athletes living below the poverty line, I think it is important that funding go the athletes and not to a large government-like bureaucacy. I will let you know if I ever get a response. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 18, 2006:
Industry says Tories might offer gym tax incentive Canadian Press TORONTO — A Conservative government would "seriously consider'' a tax incentive for gym memberships, the Fitness Industry Council of Canada said Wednesday. The organization, which represents the fitness industry and serves over 2,000 Canadian fitness facilities, sent letters to all four federal parties in December requesting their position on tax deductions for gym memberships for Canadians of all ages. The Conservative Party of Canada said it would give the initiative "serious consideration'' if elected Jan. 23, "should the fiscal framework allow for such a measure.'' The Bloc Quebecois said the issue "merits additional study and is open for discussion,'' the Liberals said "tax incentives ... do little to encourage healthy living'' and the NDP did not respond. Portions of the parties' responses, which were received in e-mail and letter form, are posted on the fitness council's website. "It really outlines the differences, I think, between the Conservatives and the Liberals,'' Dave Hardy, FIC president, said from his Edmonton office. "The Conservatives are looking to empower people to take care of their own health. The Liberals are looking to provide programs and build infrastructure to encourage people to participate.'' The Liberals argued that tax deductibility "will only reward participants already leading active, healthy lifestyles.'' Hardy said he was encouraged by the Tory response to the issue, which he said would reduce "economic barriers.'' "By allowing people to deduct the cost of gym memberships, it helps provide affordable solutions, encourages positive health behaviours in members and also in the community.'' In December, Conservative Leader Stephen Harper proposed a maximum of $500 per year per child tax credit for children under 16 years of age who register for sports or other physical activities. The party said any consideration of a tax deduction for gym memberships would be an extension of that plan. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 13, 2006:
Lottery scratches surface Canadian athletes need facilities more than cash handouts to reach elite level From the Toronto Star, Friday, January 13th. Dave Perkins makes some good points in this article, such as:
This situation is repeated in Ottawa where provincial and city taxpayers continue to subsidize the Ottawa Sentaor's Corel Center to the tune of $4 million per year. Ottawa is the only major city in Canada with no public indoor track. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 5, 2006:
Runner's Web Presents the Dave Scott Clinic - January 20 - 22, 2006 The Runner's Web is pleased to again be the presenting sponsor for the Dave Scott Clinic organized by Triathlon Ottawa. Dave will be accompanied by Sharon Donnelly, three-time Canadian Champions, 1999 Pan American Games Champion and Sydney Olympian. For clinic information visit TriathlonOttawa.com | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
January 1, 2006:
Happy New Year! From today's headlines: Johnson makes drugs claims
Apparently, in addition to all of the other side effects, prolonged steroid use also affects one's memory. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2005:
It's the end of another year and time for some brutal reflection: Athletics: You Know You're Over The Hill When...Top Ten Symptoms You know you're over the hill as a runner when..... 10. You are regularly passed by people listening to a Walkman, 9. You are regularly passed by people walking, 8. You are regularly passed by women pushing baby joggers, 7. Your favourite retort is, "You may be running faster, but you're not running any harder!", 6. The only people you pass are going in the opposite direction, 5. You are regularly passed by joggers carrying enough water to cross the Sahara Desert, 4. You are regularly passed by joggers carrying enough gel, bars, goo, and lord knows what else, to feed the third world, 3. You realize you have been telling people for the past 5 years that you are just "getting back into running" , 2. Everyone who passes you says, "Keep going, you can do it!", and you really know you are over the hill as a runner when... 1. You are regularly passed by Running Room Jog/Walk advocates....while they are walking! Ken Parker has been a runner for 35+ years and recently experienced all of the above symptoms on the same run! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 25, 2005
Merry Christmas! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 24, 2005
It's a quiet Christmas Eve in terms of running and triathlon related news. Most of the email I've received today has been SPAM. It seems that the spammers are the only ones working the net today. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 22 2005
Olympic champ admits doping FORMER Olympic champion Petra Schneider wants her German 400m medley record annulled because it was achieved by doping. Schneider, who won gold for the former East Germany at the 1980 Moscow Games, clocked 4mins 36.10sec for the 400m medley in Guayaquil, Ecuador in August 1982. It remains the fastest time swum by any Germany woman in that discipline. "My record is only a record of the past. I would like the current record list to be started afresh," she told a German television program. "My record was influenced by doping," said Schneider. In 1977, one year after the German Democratic Republic (GDR) shocked the world with its performance at the 1976 Montreal Olympics, I spent three weeks in the GDR with a number of coaches from Canada as guests of the GDR Sports Agency. During this visit we talked with officials, coaches and athletes, toured many of their sports facilities and schools and watched the Youth Olympics, a complete replica of the Olympuc Games for 16 year-olds. When we raised the issue of drugs, the feedback was, "Our success is not just due to drugs..." and one could not argue with that comment. Drugs, however, were an intergral part of their sports program. I am not aware of a GDR athlete ever testing positive until the wall came down. The fact that they were able to beat the system for so long makes me question the ability of any agency to keep sports drug free. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 21 2005
The Runner's Web will publish on it's normal schedule throughout the Christmas - New Year's holiday period. Yes, Virginia, there is NO Santa Claus! | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 20, 2005
Currently 70% of Canada 's amateur athletes live below the poverty line. The number is staggering and real. In the four years leading up to the games, most athletes cannot afford proper training, coaching, nutrition or basic living expenses. The See You In Torino Fund will support those athletes whose dreams and goals of winning gold can be realized through our efforts. The See You In Torino Fund lives and breathes to further strengthen our Canadian pride in our heroes – namely our athletes. Without those men and women who strive for excellence in amateur sport, there would be no 'flag waving' at international competitions. If you would like to make a difference and support Canada's athletes, visit SeeYouInTorino.com and make a donation. After all, it is the season of giving. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 19, 2005
The Louis Riel Dome After having endured a third-world status when it came to an indoor track and field city, Ottawa has made a quantum leap into the 21st century. The Dome @ Louis Riel contains North America's only indoor 400M track. With a four-lane oval and six-lane sprint straightaway, the facility provides an excellent training and competition venue for local athletes. The facility was built by the French Language School Board and is managed by the Ottawa Lions Track Club, one of Canada's top-ranked clubs. The Lions have already held several meets and the facility has received rave reviews. For more information on the Dome, including hours of operation etc., visit the Ottawa Liones web site at: OttawaLions.com. Note: The City of Ottawa, which has demonstrated an attitude of depraved indifference to the sport of track and field and which continues to subsidize three mercenary sports, contributed nothing towards the construction of the Dome. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 18, 2005
Despite the surge in the number of participants median marathon times across the country have slowed in the last 25 years by nearly an hour, according to reports by the Road Running Information Center. So much for the benefits of cross-training, ergs, gels and goo! On the other hand... Sex makes women sprinters faster, says German coach
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
December 17, 2005
Welcome to the Runner's Web Blog, a random rant generally related to running and triathlon and things that are wrong with the world. The election campaign is a good time to question the Liberal government about their stand on funding for Canada's national teams. On one hand, three-quarters of our team which go to the world cross country running championships - one of the world's most competitive events with global participation - have to pay their own expenses to represent Canada. On the other hand, Canada sent - fully funded - not one, not two but THREE teams to the Francophonie Games - a very weak athletics competition which is more about politics than sports. Only in Canada, eh? Pity. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Top of Runner's Blog | |
| FrontPage | |